Unknown AI usage
Teams use AI tools without a central overview of systems, purposes, data flows and responsibilities.
Embed responsibility in technology and organisation
We help companies use data and AI systems in a controlled way, with clear responsibilities, traceable processes and appropriate technical measures.
Assess compliance needs ↗Trust through clear structures
AI raises new questions: Which systems are used? What data goes in? Who decides on deployment? What risks and documentation and transparency duties apply?
evival combines privacy expertise with technical experience in software, data and AI, turning requirements into processes businesses can implement and maintain.
Common starting points
Teams use AI tools without a central overview of systems, purposes, data flows and responsibilities.
It is unclear whether the company is an AI provider or deployer and what duties follow.
Decisions, checks, training and technical measures are not documented consistently.
Our service areas
Maintain processing activities, technical and organisational measures, processor arrangements and privacy processes systematically.
Record current and planned AI systems, purposes, data, responsibilities and provider and deployer roles.
Assess use cases by their characteristics, prioritise risks and define required next steps.
Define policies, approvals, responsibilities, human oversight, monitoring and escalation paths.
Document decisions, checks, data sources, system boundaries and measures transparently.
Train employees according to their roles in opportunities, limits, data protection, security and responsible AI use.
Approach
We record systems, data processing, use cases, providers, contracts and existing rules.
Duties and risks are prioritised; open issues receive owners and realistic deadlines.
Policies, approval processes, documentation requirements and controls are designed to fit the organisation.
Permissions, logging, data minimisation, system boundaries and other measures are incorporated into solutions and workflows.
Employees are equipped with skills; systems, risks and rules are updated regularly.
Practical
Documents alone do not create compliance. We ensure requirements fit existing processes, owners understand them and technical systems support the rules.
Frequently asked questions
Depending on the system and use, a company may have duties as a deployer. Role, purpose and risk level should therefore be assessed for each relevant use case.
System and provider, purpose, users, affected processes, data used, responsibilities, company role, risk level and existing measures, among other things.
A policy is an important component. Practical approvals, responsibilities, training, documentation and ongoing controls are also needed.
Both may apply in parallel. The AI Act does not replace data protection duties; both perspectives must be considered together, especially for personal data.
Assessment
Together, we assess the current situation and identify the most important organisational and technical next steps.
Arrange a call ↗